tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5522798438913814912.post7681581347962103279..comments2023-08-20T05:29:11.299-04:00Comments on Epagonizesthai: A Note on Sura 3:78Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09374528489880046419noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5522798438913814912.post-19301386435061948492011-05-27T02:52:14.052-04:002011-05-27T02:52:14.052-04:00Hey Valley Girl apologist. Interesting to see you ...Hey Valley Girl apologist. Interesting to see you around these parts. It's great to see ya!<br /><br />Yeah that's a pretty simple argument. In fact the quotes by Ibn Abass and Ibn Munabbih in the quote I provided seem to be based on those premises. It's pretty sound reasoning, I'd say. Then again, I never really understood why Allah would supposedly preserve the Qur'an but not his previous revelations. :PFisherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09374528489880046419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5522798438913814912.post-10204038885187227912011-05-20T15:32:39.703-04:002011-05-20T15:32:39.703-04:00Great post! An easy modus ponens I like to use is:...Great post! An easy modus ponens I like to use is:<br /><br />The Qur’an states that the Torat and the Ingil are God’s Word. (Surah 3.84)<br />The Qur’an states that no one can change the Word of God. (Surah 10.64, 6.34, 35.43)<br />Therefore, no one can change the Torat and the Ingil. (they are not corrupted).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com